continuing from my last post, here are a few much more canine toys from the 1950s and 1960s. I especially like the wingtip shoe. These are in very good condition — no toothmarks — so they may never have been played with.
Dog toys, probably American, 1950s and 1960s. Latex rubber and paint, metal “squeakers,” producer unknown.
As with the collection of toys “owned” by the little Pomeranian in the snapshot that was the topic for my last post, these squeaky toys take the form of objects that dogs are not expected to be playing with, especially the glove and the shoe. Out of scale and made from unsuitable materials, these are what George Bassalla has termed “transformed objects,” where functional objects are recreated, often out of scale and from much more expensive materials then the originals, for ceremonial purposes (for example, bishops’ Croziers.)
Transformed objects are also widely used for the purposes of play, too. Think, for example, of a toy hammer made out of fabric. Such an object is safer for play, of course, and it does allow a baby to practice the gesture of hammering, but its transformed character is also amusing to the adult who gives it to the toddler. I think that we can add another characteristic to transformed play objects — they often make inappropriate, amusing sounds such as squeaking.
So “transformed object” canine toys are part of a much larger set of practices in material culture. Not that dogs care about their conceptual sophistication….
Share this:
Twitter
Facebook
More
LinkedIn
Tumblr
Like this:
Like Loading…
Related
Look whatsoever My Toys!January 16, 2016In “animal-human interaction”
Dog Toys: amusement from two points of ViewOctober 26, 2017In “animal humor”
Macy’s Kennel shop at the Westminster canine Show, 1956February 14, 2018In “animal-human interaction”